Global Intellectual Property Protection and New Constitutionalism : Hedging Exclusive Rights

Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Collectivité auteur: Oxford University Press ()
Autres auteurs: Oxford University Press (), ()
Langue:English
Publié: Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2021.
Édition:Wydanie 1.
Sujets: Zobacz więcej...
Accès en ligne:Zobacz publikację w repozytorium Oxford University Press (Open Access)
Description:
The constitutionalisation of intellectual property law is often framed as a benign and progressive integration of intellectual property with fundamental rights. Yet this is not a full or even an adequate picture of the ongoing constitutionalisation processes affecting IP. This collection of essays, written by international experts and covering a range of different areas of intellectual property law, takes a broader approach to the process. Drawing on constitutional theory, and particularly on ideas of ‘new constitutionalism’, the chapters engage with the complex array of contemporary legal constraints on intellectual property law-making. Such constraints arising in international intellectual property law, human rights law (including human rights protection for right-holders), investment treaties, and forms of private ordering.

Wykaz orzeczeń i aktów prawnych na stronach IX-XXXIII.


This volume was initiated as a result of Tuomos Mylly's successful application for Academy of Finland funding for the research project 'Constitutional Hedges of Intellectual Property' (Academy of Finland, Decision 298381). (s. V)
Table des matières:
  • Mylly, Tuomas Griffiths, Jonathan The Transformation of Global Intellectual Property Protection : General Introduction (s. 1–20) https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198863168.003.0001
  • Grosse Ruse-Khan, Henning Effects of Combined Hedging : Overlapping and Accumulating Protection for Intellectual Property Assets on a Global Scale (s. 23–49) https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198863168.003.0002
  • Mylly, Tuomas The New Constitutional Architecture of Intellectual Property (s. 50–80) https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198863168.003.0003
  • Senftleben, Martin From Flexible Balancing Tool to Quasi-Constitutional Straitjacket : How the EU Cultivates the Constraining Function of the Three-Step Test (s. 83–105) https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198863168.003.0004
  • Lee, Nari Hedging (into) Property? : Invisible Trade Secrets and International Trade in Goods (s. 106–128) https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198863168.003.0005
  • Plomer, Aurora A Market-Friendly Human Rights Paradigm for Intellectual Property Rights in Europe? (s. 131-154) https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198863168.003.0006
  • Dreyfuss, Rochelle C. Hedging Bets with BITS : The Impact of Investment Obligations on Intellectual Property Norms (s. 157–175) https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198863168.003.0007
  • Yu, Peter K. The Second Transformation of the International Intellectual Property Regime (s. 176–196) https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198863168.003.0008
  • Acquah, Daniel Technical Assistance as a Hedge to Intellectual Property Exclusivity (s. 197–218) https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198863168.003.0009
  • Husovec, Martin Quintais, João Pedro Too Small to Matter? : On the Copyright Directive’s Bias in Favour of Big Right-Holders (s. 219–238) https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198863168.003.0010
  • Sganga, Caterina Multilevel Constitutionalism and the Propertisation of EU Copyright : An Even Higher Protection or a New Structural Limitation? (s. 241–266) https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198863168.003.0011
  • Geiger, Christophe Desaunettes-Barbero, Luc The Revitalisation of the Object and Purpose of the TRIPS Agreement : The Plain Packaging Reports and the Awakening of the TRIPS Flexibility Clauses (s. 267–294) https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198863168.003.0012
  • Souza, Allan Rocha de Copyright, Human Rights, and the Social Function of Property in Brazil (s. 295–317) https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198863168.003.0013
  • Reynold, Graham Hedge or Counterweight? : New Constitutionalism and the Role of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms in Intellectual Property Litigation (s. 318–340) https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198863168.003.0014